From offices to homes: Are England’s housing conversions creating fire safety risks?

Dozens of organisations have urged the UK government to abolish permitted development rights for office-to-residential conversions, citing the loss of affordable homes and concerns over fire safety.

Share this content

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Campaigners call for end to office-to-residential conversions in England

Dozens of organisations have urged the UK government to abolish permitted development rights for office-to-residential conversions, citing the loss of affordable homes and concerns over fire safety.

According to the Guardian, the Local Government Association (LGA) has reported that almost 28,000 affordable homes have been lost through such conversions in the past 11 years.

Permitted development rights (PDR) grant automatic planning permission for certain building projects, bypassing requirements to provide affordable housing.

A group of 39 signatories, including Shelter, the Town and Country Planning Association and the Association of Directors of Public Health, have signed an open letter calling for the end of PDR for office-to-residential projects.

The letter said the policy was “indefensible” and warned: “Many would not meet the most basic fire safety and habitability standards had they been subject to the planning process.”

Parliamentary debate on planning and infrastructure bill

The Guardian reported that an amendment to the government’s planning and infrastructure bill, which is currently before parliament, seeks to remove some PDR allowances.

The amendment was tabled by Dorothy Thornhill, a vice-president of the LGA.

Thornhill said: “The impact of certain PDR rules has gone much further than was ever anticipated when they were first bought in. It is time they were scrapped. Councils and communities are losing out significantly because developers are able to circumvent the democratic planning process.”

The LGA has estimated that more than 110,000 homes have been created from former offices under PDR since 2013.

The group said councils had been unable to enforce affordable housing contributions or guarantee that homes met quality and safety standards.

Analysis of quality and safety of converted homes

The Guardian highlighted that several studies have shown homes built under PDR are more likely to be smaller, darker and poorly ventilated.

The homes have also been reported in unsuitable areas such as industrial estates and business parks.

Campaigners argue that fire safety and habitability standards would have applied if these homes had gone through the full planning process.

The open letter stated: “Communities lose twice: on the quality and suitability of the homes, and on the schools, transport, green spaces and health services that make neighbourhoods thrive.”

The LGA added that a quarter of the 130,000 families in temporary housing could be living in affordable homes if office-to-residential conversions had contributed to housing targets.

Case study in Bristol highlights concerns

According to the Guardian, the housing charity Shelter has criticised housing conditions in a former office block in Bristol known as Imperial Apartments.

The building, converted into 466 flats under PDR, has been reported to suffer from damp, mould, overcrowding and rodent infestations.

More than 500 people, including local doctors and charities, signed a letter urging Bristol city council to rehouse tenants from the site.

Residents said the block retained heavy security and fire doors from its office days, making it unsuitable for families.

They also reported that the walls were thin and poorly insulated, raising additional concerns about fire safety and habitability.

Local government and campaign group responses

Louise Gittins, chair of the LGA, said the proposed amendment to planning legislation “could be a gamechanger”.

Gittins said: “PDR allows developers to avoid contributing to affordable housing in the local area which has a real-world impact. A quarter of families in temporary accommodation could be permanently housed.”

Campaign groups have said office-to-residential conversions not only reduce the availability of affordable housing but also present risks to residents due to lower standards in construction and safety.

The Guardian reported that the groups behind the open letter are pressing the government to ensure new housing is both affordable and safe.

They added that the policy risks creating long-term issues if poor-quality conversions continue.

Government response to the criticism

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government responded to the Guardian’s coverage of the issue.

The spokesperson said: “The government is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation backed by £39bn investment.

“We recognise there has been criticisms of delivering homes using permitted development rights and that is why we continue to keep these rights under review.”

The ministry indicated that while the policy is under review, it continues to defend its record on housing supply.

Relevance for fire and safety professionals

This issue highlights how planning frameworks directly affect housing quality and fire safety standards.

Permitted development rights can allow conversions to bypass the normal oversight that ensures compliance with safety regulations.

The debate underscores the importance of maintaining clear regulatory pathways to prevent unsafe housing conditions.

For fire safety professionals, the situation demonstrates how policy decisions on planning can create long-term risks for residents and communities.

Campaigners call for end to office-to-residential conversions in England: Summary

Dozens of organisations have signed an open letter urging the government to abolish office-to-residential conversions.

The Guardian reported that the Local Government Association said almost 28,000 affordable homes have been lost in the past 11 years through permitted development rights.

Permitted development rights grant automatic planning permission and do not require affordable housing contributions.

The letter warned that many conversions would not meet basic fire safety and habitability standards.

The amendment to the planning and infrastructure bill aims to remove PDR allowances.

Dorothy Thornhill of the LGA said the rules had gone further than anticipated and should be scrapped.

The LGA estimated more than 110,000 homes have been created through PDR since 2013.

Studies showed converted homes were smaller, darker and often located in unsuitable areas.

In Bristol, a campaign has raised concerns about poor conditions at Imperial Apartments.

Louise Gittins of the LGA said PDR allows developers to avoid contributing to affordable housing.

A government spokesperson said it is delivering investment in affordable housing and continues to review PDR.

Newsletter
Receive the latest breaking news straight to your inbox

Add Your Heading Text Here